As was the case with Heller/Parker vs. DC, standing might well once again be a crucial issue in a gun case. Interesting.

As others have noted, it comes as no surprise that the Brady Bunch has their facts garbled. How can you expect to successfully bring suit to the highest courts in the land and advance your cause when you fail to command even the most perfunctory facts of the case? One gathers that at this point the BC et al are dilettantes, superficially making stabs in the dark at relevancy without any real broad-based support or coherent agenda. In other words, the thinking over there seems to be “well we lost big on the be-all, end-all endgame at the SCOTUS, we’ve been abandoned by the one political party that used to actually answer our calls, our viewpoints are less popular year by year, and we’re running low on cash…I guess it’s better to do something, anything at all, no matter how disorganized and ill-conceived, since it’ll otherwise obvious that all we’re doing is nothing.”

2008 is coming to a close; it’s been a crappy year all around for a great many of us…economy in tatters, wars on many fronts, international issues looming, bank accounts hurting. That 2008 brought us Heller and and a definitive affirmation from the SCOTUS should be viewed as no small consolation, in my humble opinion.